The smart lock market is fractured across competing ecosystems — Apple HomeKey, Google Home, Amazon Alexa, Samsung SmartThings, and Home Assistant — each with a different feature set per lock model. A lock that supports Apple HomeKey tap-to-unlock might not support Google Home remote unlock, or vice versa. The result is that a consumer's lock choice is dictated not by which lock is best, but by which lock works with the smartphone and voice assistant already in their pocket and on their countertop.
The Schlage Encode Plus illustrates the problem precisely: it offers full HomeKey support with seamless Apple Wallet integration, but its Google Home and Alexa features are limited without an additional hub purchase. Yale Assure 2 takes the fragmentation problem even further by requiring different hardware modules — Z-Wave, WiFi, or Matter — for different ecosystems. Buy the wrong module at installation and you permanently lose access to features that other ecosystems support. There is no universal module.
Matter and Thread were supposed to solve this fragmentation by providing a single interoperability standard. In practice, Matter/Thread adoption across the smart lock industry is "years behind schedule," as The Verge and Wirecutter have both documented. Many locks announced with Matter support still have not shipped with it, and others that do ship with Matter often support a reduced feature set compared to their proprietary ecosystem integrations.
Reddit r/HomeKit users report a particularly frustrating pattern: buying a lock specifically for HomeKey support, only to discover that auto-unlock via geofencing — the feature that makes HomeKey truly seamless — does not work reliably with their chosen lock and HomeKit hub combination. The consumer's research burden is not just "which lock should I buy?" but "which lock, module, hub, and ecosystem combination works for my specific phone and voice assistant?"